![]() I would appreciate if anyone has any insight, and as I promised, I will have a scan posted in the next few hours. One other possibility is the failure to tighten the film when loading the spool, but I can't believe that would generate the same regular patter I see from these two backs.I'm not that gifted :rolleyes:Īnyway, I have debated taping the damn things up.which reduces the convenience but solves the problem (I assume) while I resolve this. I would like to add here that occaisionally some frames do not exhibit the light leak at all. something to do with reflection? Tis would be on the opposite side to where I am seeing the leak. Is it possible that both the backs I have tested that leak, have a leak in the same exact place!.I assume that place would have to be the dark slide curtain? I did read somewhere that a dark slide curtain leak exhibits itself on the opposite side to the curtain. Where it becomes confusing is that this would lead me to believe that the insert can not be the source of the leak, but the back is. I assume the leak would be in front of the film plane, since I read somewhere that a leak in front exhibits as a white light mark and behind is a red light mark (I know the colour because I have seen the leak on a colour slide film). It almost always appears in the same location about 1.5cms down the frame on the right hand side as I would have composed the picture.which to me means the bottom left hand side of the back? But it does sometime appear in between two frames (rarely). Integrated grips with fast thumb winding and AE prisms are available, something unmatched by Hasselblad unless you spend 3000. I’m Back, the company behind the popular Digital Back for old 35mm SLRs, is well back. ![]() The light leak is regular though of varying brightness along the different frames but exhibits itself as a slim (2mm line expending to almost the middle of the frame ending at a point.fading towards the middle) and starts at the edge so includes the rebate area outside the image. Bronica SQ is essentially a clone of the 6圆 Hasselblad, but electronic, much less expensive and with much more reliable lens shutters. The leak still appears to be there (alot fainter, but in the same location.and I did take the pictures in quite quick succession, but in bright sunlight).remember no leak on the other good back.so the camera is not the problem? One seems good and not to exhibit this problem, the one of the others has a crack on the edge of the body though not in the sealed area of the insert (and the crack is at the top and so probably not the e the relevance below.but I will ignore this back), and I have another back which had a 220 insert, in to which I switched the 120 insert from the cracked one. ![]() When it was desired to use a roll 120 in a rectangular shape. I have spent the last few days trying to find something remotely similar to my problems (including here in APUG) and could find nothing. Hasselblad Series 500 C series Bronica S, Kiev 88, Mamiya C330 series, Rolleiflex Automat, Bronica SQ A B, Rolleiflex 6000 series, Rolleiflex model E F, Yashica MAT 124 series. OK, this is for starters, since I will post a scan of the negatives when I get home. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |